![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() How the agencies examined a “no-build” alternative to constructing the bridge also didn’t violate federal law, Diaz wrote. The plaintiffs argued that sea-level rise and lower traffic forecasts for the bridge in part warranted another deep examination. Instead, a statement reevaluation by the agencies found no significant issues. Diaz wrote the agencies didn’t need to file a supplemental environmental impact statement to the one originally completed in 2012 after project funding delays. Writing the unanimous opinion, Circuit Judge Albert Diaz agreed with the decision by U.S. It also would ease traffic at the only other sound crossing - the Wright Memorial Bridge linking Kitty Hawk and Point Harbor.Ĭitizens’ advocacy and wildlife groups represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center sued in 2019. They argued the agencies didn’t follow the rules in making its decision, specifically with the required environmental analysis. Proponents say it would benefit Outer Banks residents and vacationers, particularly during hurricane evacuation. The proposed 7-mile, $500 million project includes a 4.7-mile toll bridge crossing the Currituck Sound between Aydlett and Corolla. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, agreed with a 2021 trial court ruling that sided with the state Transportation Department, the Federal Highway Administration and agency officials seeking to construct the Mid-Currituck Bridge. transportation officials to build a toll bridge connecting North Carolina’s mainland and the northern Outer Banks.Ī three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. (AP) - A federal appeals court upheld on Thursday the decision by state and U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |